Showing posts with label Big Ideas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Big Ideas. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 10, 2016

Star Wars Quick-Takes: The Empire Strikes Back- The Danger of Isolation

Yoda sure does seem wise, doesn’t he? A lot of the things he says do make good sense. However, there’s one instruction he gives to Luke that we just can’t tolerate. Much to our relief, Luke can’t either, so he decides to ignore the sage, old Jedi Master’s advice, and set off on a quest to rescue his friends and fight Darth Vader.
Did Luke make the correct choice by rushing out on this ill-advised rescue mission? In spite of Yoda’s statements, The Empire Strikes Back presents several examples of the deadly folly of individualism.


Early in the film, at the beginning of the battle on Hoth, Luke’s co-pilot, declares that he feels like he could take on the Empire single-handedly. This overconfident attitude does not serve him well, as he is killed soon afterwards.


Later, in what is probably the most iconic light saber battle in all of Star Wars, Luke takes on Darth Vader by himself,(without even the companionship of his faithful droid R2-D2). Though Luke develops his skills with the force, and is enlightened as to the true fate of his father; he loses his hand, and is nearly killed in the fall from Cloud City.


In the end, he discovers that one of the most important things a force-sensitive person can learn is to reach out to others around him. The only way he is saved from certain death is by calling out to Leia, who directs Lando and Chewbacca to go back to the city and rescue him.

It seems that while Yoda may offer decent life advice when he says “do or do not, there is no try”, he doesn’t have it all worked out. People need to be able to rely on each other, and to help each other. We can’t make it on our own...That’s not how the Force works! (Or real life, for that matter).

Friday, January 29, 2016

Star Wars Quick-Takes: A New Hope- Tatooine and The House of Bread

Almost every story of redemption begins in the most hopeless of places. Perhaps it has to. Maybe that’s part of what makes a story a redemption story. Suppose Star Wars had started out on Alderaan, an epicenter of the Rebellion. It would have been an entirely different type of movie if a highly trained and educated rebel leader faced up against the Empire’s destructive symbol of power.

But we so love the stories where hope comes out of left field. Out of the places least expected. We want to follow the transformation. To hear lines like “There’ll be no escape for the princess this time”, and “Well, if there’s a bright center to the universe, you’re on the planet that it’s farthest from”, and then see them proved wrong.

That’s why Star Wars, was , has been, and continues to be so popular. It takes the hopelessness so prevalent in the world around us, and flips it on its head. It finds its heroes in the most unlikely, least desirable places.

That resonates with us. I wonder why. I have a funny feeling it began a long time ago in a little town far, far away (at least from me). The city they called The House of Bread. Bethlehem.

Wednesday, January 20, 2016

Star Wars Quick-Takes: Revenge of the Sith- A Shattered Mirror


Part of what made the original Star Wars trilogy so influential was the simplicity of its narrative. It was the classic hero’s journey. The first three movies told the story of Luke Skywalker’s progression from a simple farm boy to a heroic and powerful Jedi Master.

The prequel trilogy tells the opposite story. It is the tragic tale of Anakin Skywalker’s rise to power and fall from grace. Some of the most poignant moments of Revenge of the Sith are dark reflections of similar scenes from the culminating film of the original trilogy, Return of the Jedi.

Throughout Revenge of the Sith, Anakin has trouble seeing the line between good and evil. Both Chancellor Palpatine and Mace Windu are willing to kill to accomplish their goals, and encourage him to kill to further their purposes. Throughout Return of the Jedi, Luke sees clearly the delineation between good and evil. He can see the good left in his father through the evil. He knows that his conscience will not allow him to kill, in spite of the fact that the evil Emperor Palpatine is encouraging him to do so for seemingly good reasons.

The story of the first six episodes of Star Wars are also the story of Anakin Skywalker’s fall and redemption. The motif of this plot line is the mask of Darth Vader. At the end of Revenge of the Sith, Anakin’s descent into darkness is complete, and he puts on the mask for the first time. At the end of Return of the Jedi, his redemption is sealed when he takes of the mask for the last time. (I am interested to see how the motif of Darth Vader’s mask is used going forward in the new trilogy).

Whether or not you like the Star Wars prequels, it is very interesting to see how they mirror the plot of the original series, and provide a background against which its story of redemption truly shines.

Keep on glowing in the dark,
Elora

Tuesday, January 19, 2016

Star Wars Quick-Takes: Attack of the Clones- Blind Seers

We don’t get too much about what the Jedi Order used to be like from watching the Star Wars film, (you people who write for Wookiepedia can fill me in on the expanded universe stuff), but we get the impression that the age that the prequels are set in is far from “The Golden Age of The Jedi”. When we discussed The Phantom Menace, we took a look at how blind the Jedi Council had become to things going on outside of their ranks. In Attack of the Clones, we see the true extent of their hypocrisy and blindness.

Obi Wan Kenobi’s diner-owner friend Dex makes the poignant statement in his conversation with Obi Wan, “I should think you Jedi would have more respect for the difference between knowledge and wisdom”. This seems to be a good summary of the decay that is taking place within the Jedi Order in the prequel trilogy. They have retained knowledge, but lost wisdom.

Generally, knowledge is considered to be the cold, hard facts of a matter. The raw data, the charts, the graphs, the numbers, the word-for-word recitation, the names and dates, and technical ability. Wisdom is knowing what to do with knowledge. It is being able to see through the data, charts, graphs, and numbers to the heart of the issue. It is understanding and applying the word-for-word recitation. It is knowing the faces behind the names, and the significance behind the dates. For the main spiritual and philosophical entity in the galaxy to have lost the ability is a grave situation.

When Obi Wan goes to the Jedi Temple to investigate the planet Kamino, and discovers that it has been wiped from the databases, he is told by the temple librarian that it obviously doesn’t exist. This reflects the prevailing attitude of holding to facts without discernment. Later, when the plot to create a clone army has been uncovered, Yoda admits to this fault on the part of the Jedi leaders, “Blind we are if the creation of this clone army we could not see.”

When the spiritual leaders of a society sacrifice their wisdom for mere facts, that society is vulnerable to attack. When the artists, and thinkers, and prophets forget about wisdom and focus merely on transmitting information, crisis is inevitable. Rulers come to power who would rather that understanding remained dim; because, if the people were enlightened to the truth, these rulers would lose their authority. The masses are deceived, and the truth remains suppressed until a new group of people,who have the ability to see, rises up. The restored balance between wisdom and knowledge brings with it, well, a new hope.

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

Top-5 Tuesday- Most Influential Early Utopias

The concept of Utopia has been around since long before Thomas More coined the word. From as early as the construction of the Tower of Babel, mankind has been looking to regain the world of perfect harmony it lost at the fall. Since sci-fi offers speculative commentary on the human condition, it makes sense that the subgenres of utopia and dystopia are prominent within the genre. Utopian fiction was, in fact one of the best represented subgenres of sci-fi in the first century of science fiction.


So, here are some of the most thought-provoking and influential perfect-world stories, which shaped fiction and society in the years following their release.


5. A Crystal Age by W.H. Hudson (1887)-

A strange and fantastic tale of a simple, peaceful, post-apocalyptic world, and the modern man who struggles to adapt. A Crystal Age is notable for defining the pastoral utopia- a perfect world free from technology and industrialization- and for predicting the ecological spiritualism which is prevalent in our century.


4. The Crater by James Fenimore Cooper (1847)-

Written by all-American Romanticist James Fenimore Cooper, this lost-island utopian story comments on the struggle between colonialism and native peoples.


3. Erewhon by Samuel Butler (1872)-

Erewhon, an anagram of ‘nowhere’, is not a utopia in the traditional sense of the word. The world of Erewhon is not perfect, though it is also not bad enough to be classified as a dystopia. Samuel Butler used his story to poke fun at Victorian society.


2. Utopia by Thomas More (1516)-

Long before science fiction was an established genre, Thomas More gave later writers something to think about when he coined a new word for an old idea. Utopia, meaning both ‘good place’, and ‘no place’, was the title of his fictional depiction of his idea of the perfect society.


1. Looking Backward: 2000-1887 by Edward Bellamy (1888)-

Bellamy’s novel depicted a future American utopia governed by the principles of socialism. Not only was it one of the best-sellers of its time, but it also inspired a movement to implement the ideas contained within. Readers were attracted to the harmony and order found in the book, and some even started experimental communities in an attempt to build utopia from the ground up.


The study of utopian fiction is a fascinating, though sad one. People have striven for millennia to find peace with themselves and their fellow men. Utopian literature gives us a well-preserved peek at some of the tried-and-failed ideas of past visionaries. We see questions without answers- questions that cannot be answered apart from reconciliation between humanity and its creator.


Keep on glowing in the dark,
Elora

Tuesday, April 7, 2015

Top-5 Tuesday- Memorable Sci-fi Characters of the 1800s

If you hadn’t guessed already, I have a special fondness in my heart for good fictional characters. Though sci-fi historically has been a genre more of speculation than of character arcs, the best science fiction stories have been able to develop their ideas as well as their protagonists, antagonists, and side characters. I just discussed one of the most iconic characters in all of science fiction on Saturday, but today we are going to take a look at the characters who connected readers to the earliest science fiction stories.

Let’s get to it!

5. Hank Morgan (A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court by Mark Twain)-

An early adventurer through time, Hank Morgan, the titular Connecticut Yankee, bumbles his way through the past, trying to conform the Medieval world to his own standards of civilization. As bad as that sounds, how many of us wouldn’t do the same under similar circumstances?

4. The Time Machine/The Time Traveller (The Time Machine by H.G. Wells)-

Can a time machine be a character? Just take the issue up with your local Doctor Who fan, and I think you’ll be convinced. The Victorian sensibilities and personality of the title character of this book has sparked many an imagination, and inspired many an imitator, especially after it was brought to the silver screen in the 1960s adaptation of Wells’ classic. However, the adventurous protagonist, The Time Traveller, provides the heart of the story and the machine, and evokes a sense of wanderlust for other times in readers.

3.  Captain Nemo (Twenty-Thousand Leagues Under the Sea by Jules Verne)-

This Indian prince turned mad inventor is the early science fiction equivalent of Captain Ahab from Moby Dick. However, this crazed captain’s vengeful intentions are turned toward the British Empire rather than a white whale. With a thirst for revenge, and remorse over the deaths of his crew, Captain Nemo set a precedent for many a great antihero.

2. Frankenstein and His Monster (Frankenstein by Mary Shelley)-

A classic example of confused name, the sympathetic creation in Mary Shelley’s classic is often tagged with the name of his creator, and when mad scientist Victor is mentioned, images of his monster. Both the tormented young scientist, and his forsaken creature, however, are well-developed characters who earn the investment readers put into their story.

1. Dr. Jekyll/Mr. Hyde (The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson)-

Jekyll/Hyde is a classic and fascinating dichotomization of human nature. Good vs. evil, power vs. weakness, cruelty vs. compassion- these are all things we are forced to wrestle with. Robert Louis Stevenson presents this struggle in a literal way through a character/characters we simultaneously root for and despise.

What do you think? Who else belongs on this list? What are your favorite early sci-fi characters. I’d love to hear from you in the comments! Thanks for reading!

Keep on glowing in the dark,
Elora

Saturday, April 4, 2015

Character Analysis, Mr. Spock

It was the opening day of my show when I found out about Leonard Nimoy’s passing. I shared some brief words on social media, that day, then expounded on them on my radio show, SpaceTime, that Tuesday. This post is going to be very similar to what I said on SpaceTime. However, it is my first time organizing my thoughts on paper. So, I hope you enjoy this exploration of the character arc of Spock.


How does a character created for a rejected 1960s television pilot become a respected figure in a 2013 blockbuster? How does a an alien from an early sci-fi show that got cancelled after three seasons become a household name- a part of our modern mythology? I’m sure every creative wants to know.
As impossible as it may seem, we find this transformation in the character of Spock. I’m going to briefly explore Spock’s character arc from “The Cage” to Star Trek Into Darkness, and see what has made Leonard Nimoy’s Spock one of the most loved sci-fi characters of the past fifty years.
When we first meet Spock in the unaired Star Trek pilot “The Cage”, he hasn’t quite grown into the stoic-yet-conflicted, logical first officer we know and love. Beginning in 1966, when he is brought back onto the show with Captain Kirk and Doctor McCoy , he represents the intellectual side of the holistic human portrayed by these three men. I discussed the relationship and conflict between them in this past post.
Though Spock represents one aspect of a complete human, as part of the main trio, he also represents a complete human in and of himself. Though Spock is only half-human, he shows the very human struggle between logic and emotion very clearly. Do I listen to my heart or my mind?
While Captain Kirk has to struggle over who on the outside to listen to- Spock (logic), or McCoy (emotion)- Spock has to choose who on the inside to listen to- his human (emotional) half, or his vulcan (logical) half.
This is a struggle that we as humans can all relate to, and it is the struggle we see all throughout The Original Series.
The Animated Series, as goofy as it is, sees the same basic relationship between the three main characters, and the same internal struggle in Spock. However, we also get a peek into Spock’s early experiences that let to his development in TOS in the episode, “Yesteryear”. (Also, there is a seventy-foot Spock clone out there somewhere, that the reboot series should totally revisit. Just saying).
In The Motion Picture, Spock has made his decision. He is going to purge himself of all emotion through the kolinahr ritual. But he fails. This failure plunges him back into the turmoil he experienced in the original series, and he casts his lot with the crew of the U.S.S. Enterprise crew once again. It really seems like he’s happier that way, though.
By The Wrath of Khan, Spock has learned to accept the dichotomy of his existence. He is logical and emotional- Vulcan and Human. He can not dismiss or repress either side of himself. Then, of course, he dies. When his soul is reunited with his body in The Search for Spock, he has to start from scratch.
In the beginning of The Voyage Home, we see a Spock who does not find any relevance in retraining the human part of himself. However, by the end of the movie, he sees the importance of rescuing Chekov from the hospital, even if it is not the most logical move.
The Final Frontier...happened. Alright, ok. Bear with me. Even though Star Trek V isn’t very good, there is an important character moment for Spock- it doesn't even involve gravity boots. His weird half-brother Sybok shows him his greatest pain, a scene which demonstrates the dichotomy between his humanity and his vulcanness. Spock, however, has already come to terms with his deepest pain. He was able to once again reconcile the logic and emotion deep down inside of him.
In Star Trek VI, Spock faces the consequences of his own failure. The young Vulcan officer Valeris, whom he trained to be his successor, turns out to be a warmonger and a spy. Despite this mistake, is Spock still relevant and useful?
It would appear so. In the 2009 Star Trek reboot, Leonard Nimoy’s Spock serves as a mentor and and a counselor to the alternate versions of both Kirk and Spock. His advice to new Spock- to follow his heart and not just his head, not just his head- mirrors the journey Prime Spock took throughout his life.
In Star Trek Into Darkness, Nimoy’s Spock goes against reason, and better judgement, and tells the new Spock how to avoid some of the Khan-related mistakes of his past. The punching and yelling that ensued cannot be blamed on Prime Spock at all.
Logic, emotions, uncertainty, mistakes- these are all things everyone has to sift through and deal with. The thoughtful and nuanced way that Leonard Nimoy portrayed these conflicts in Spock ensure that his character will continue to live long and prosper even after the beloved actor’s death.

Keep on glowing in the dark ,
Elora
kolinahr

Thursday, February 5, 2015

Visions of the Future: The 1830s- Lighting and Fire


The world was in flux. Science turned up new wonders and terrors everyday. Revolution spread like a wildfire. The future was uncertain. Readers turned to the fledgling genre of science fiction for diversion, but also for any sort of idea of what the future might hold.


History:

The 1830s was another decade rife with revolutions and change. In the year 1830, Mormon church was established, and challenged societal and religious norms. The Belgian Revolution took place that same year.

In 1831, an American slave named Nat Turner instigated a rebellion with several other slaves which ended in violence, bloodshed, and hatred. The same year, young ministry student and natural science hobbyist Charles Darwin set sail on his legendary voyage on the HMS Beagle. Also, Greece became an independent nation.

1833 saw the founding of the city of Chicago; and the first presidential assassination attempt in America in 1835 when Richard Lawrence misfired twice in an attempt to shoot president Andrew Jackson. Finally, in 1839, the First Opium war was waged between England and China.

Science:

(NGC 3603)
Both proteins and enzymes were first discovered in the 1830s. The discovery of the first enzyme in 1833 marked the beginning of the science of biochemistry. The first recognized protein was discovered in 1838.

Astronomy also advanced during this era, with new sightings and techniques. In 1834 John Herschel sighted what is now known as open cluster NGC 3603. Then, in 1839 Thomas Henderson calculated the first parallax measurement to Alpha Centauri. The first photograph of the moon was taken in 1839.

Some notable inventions of the 1830s are Morse’s telegraph (1837), and the Colt revolver (1838).


Stories:
(This is a picture of Edgar Allan Poe in a birthday hat that my brother left on my phone. I thought I would share it.)

Edgar Allan Poe became the chief figure of science fiction during the 1830s. Though most people usually think of Poe as a horror writer, he often delved into ideas of science and technology. Usually, Poe’s stories concluded grimly, as the technology so many people praised ended up being the downfall of the main characters. A few examples of Poe’s stories are the apocalyptic “Conversation of Eiros and Charmion”, and the satirical “Unparalleled Adventures of One Hans Pfaal”, which chronicled a voyage in a hot air balloon.


James Fenimore Cooper, of The Last of the Mohicans fame, broke into the genre with The Monikins, a tale of a civilization of intelligent apes published in 1835.

Also published in 1835, a fascinating Russian novel called The Year 4338: The Petersburg Letters, describes a future utopia on the eve of the apocalypse. China and Russia are the main world powers in Vladmir Odoevsky’s speculated future.

Worldview:

(Kierkegaard)
One of the early proponents of existentialism, Soren Kierkegaard, rose to prominence during the 1830s. He was a theologian who often criticized organized religion, and made a distinction between the “objective”-the material world- and the “subjective”-the moral/ethical/spiritual realm.
Around the same time, philosopher Auguste Comte pioneered the science of sociology, calling his views the “religion of humanity”.

Writers and poets of the time were still heavily influenced by Romanticism.  


What would scientists come up with next? Who could know what the next day would hold, much less the next four-thousand years? Would it be apocalypse, or utopia. The only place these questions were answered was in the minds of science fiction pioneers.

Keep on glowing in the dark,

Elora

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

Visions of the Future: The 1820s- A Modern Prometheus

                                                 


          


    I hope you’re strapped in. We’re about to travel back 195 years to a time when science fiction was still in its infancy. Today, we’re going to look at the future according to the 1820s.


    Two years before, a young woman had revolutionized fiction with a story she had written for a competition between friends. Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, combined elements of literature that had come before with scientific speculation of the day to make a stunning commentary on human nature.


   1820 was science fiction’s first full decade, and the genre was already far ahead of its time.


History:


    The mid-nineteenth century was a time of global political upheaval. The American revolution inspired nations around the world to fight for their own liberation, and establish their own constitutions. A wave of Constitutionalist revolutions hit southern Europe in the year 1820. They were followed by the Mexican revolution, in which Mexico won independence in 1824, and the Decembrist revolution in Russia, which took place in December of 1825.


    Great Britain saw new developments in their legal system, when the death penalty was repealed for over 100 crimes in 1822, and means of punishment such as drawing and quartering, and flagellation became antiquated.


    The United States was in the midst of a great debate concerning slavery. In the 1820s, slavery was still legal, but some slaves who had been freed were allowed to return to their continent of origin. In 1822, the first freed slaves arrived in Africa and settled in the American colony of Liberia.


    In order to avoid the conflict in Europe, the United States instituted the Monroe Doctrine in 1823, which effectively severed relations between the old world and the new. However, the nation experienced conflict of its own during the election of 1824 when John Quincy Adams was elected president, despite the fact that his opponent, Andrew Jackson, had won the popular vote. Frustration over this issue was one of the factors that led to the development of the modern Democratic party.

Science:


(A Difference Engine)

    Many explorers doubled as scientists in the nineteenth century. This was especially true of those undertaking expeditions to the Antarctic. In 1820, a Russian expedition came very near the coast of the mysterious continent. Later that same year, British Naval officer Edward Bransfield arrived at the northernmost point of the Antarctic mainland.


    At the same time, in a completely different field of study,Hans Christian Ørsted, discovered the relationship between electricity and magnetism. Already, electricity was important to science fiction and to society.


    In 1822, the Rosetta Stone was unearthed by Archaeologists, and used to decipher Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics.


    Also during that year, Charles Babbage proposed his “Difference Engine”- a calculation device that was an early ancestor of the computer.


    The Stockton and Darlington Railroad opened in 1825, and served as the first railroad to implement steam-powered trains. In 1826, the patent for the internal combustion engine was given to Samuel Morey, and the oldest existing photograph was taken.


    The electric motor was developed by Anyos Jedlik in 1828, and the next year, William Burt received  the patent for a very early typewriter.


Stories:


   Mary Shelley wrote a second novel in 1826 called, The Last Man. It tells the tale of a plague that ravages earth in the far future, and follows the lives of the survivors. This novel was not well received. Evidently, it let down readers, who were hoping for something of the same caliber as Frankenstein. However, The Last Man serves as a precursor to stories of apocalyptic pandemics, including the zombie subgenre that is hugely popular today.


    An American politician named George Tucker contributed to the genre in 1827 with his satiric story, A Voyage to the Moon. Using the pseudonym Joseph Atterley, he described the civilizations of the Lunarians in order to parody some of his political colleagues, and faulty scientific ideas of the day.


    Jane C. Louden’s The Mummy! was similar in many ways to Frankenstein, as it involved a reanimated corpse. However, it is unique as the story takes place in the twenty-second century, where technology is highly developed. It is also one of the first novels to utilize the “mummy’s curse”. It seems to have been quite timely, as the Rosetta Stone was discovered just five years prior to its release.

Worldview:


(Stormy Coast Scene after a Shipwreck- Horace Vernet)
    In response to the increasing industrialization of the western world, many thinkers in the early nineteenth century embraced Romanticism, an offshoot of Enlightenment thought that emphasized nature, imagination, and overwhelming emotional experiences. This inspired the focus on horror, amazement, and awe in early science fiction.
    Because nature was so central to Romanticism, it was considered an atrocity to try to master it. Therefore, when Victor Frankenstein brought life from lifeless flesh, he experienced deep mental anguish and horror. He was attempting to upset the balance of nature.


     However, it is clear that Frankenstein was also trying to play God, and create his own race of superhumans. This is the same basic intent Eve had when she ate the fruit in the Garden of Eden. She wanted to be like God. Both the historical Eve, and the fictional Frankenstein experienced the ghastly consequences of elevating themselves to the place of the Most High.


(If you want to read more about the idea of humans trying to create life, check out this post!)


    We see from the very beginning, science fiction was answering deep questions about the human condition. These are important themes for us to think about as believers, and there are many truths we can draw from the stories that ask them.


Conclusion:

    The world was changing quickly. Political structure, science, and philosophy were transforming more rapidly than ever before. The 1820s ushered in a new era of storytelling, a new mythology that compensated for the strange, new world around it.

Keep on glowing in the dark,
Elora